Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Hap1p
|
YPR065W
|
PubMed
Zitomer RS et al., Microbiol Rev, 1992 Mar;56(1):1-11Zitomer RS et al., Microbiol Rev, 1992 Mar;56(1):1-11 |
N/A |
|
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Keng T, Mol Cell Biol, 1992 Jun;12(6):2616-23Keng T, Mol Cell Biol, 1992 Jun;12(6):2616-23 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
in Δhem1 cells, supplemented with δ-ALA (heme-sufficient and aerobic conditions) |
PubMed
Deckert J et al., Genetics, 1995 Mar;139(3):1149-58Deckert J et al., Genetics, 1995 Mar;139(3):1149-58 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
Anaerobiosis |
PubMed
Amillet JM et al., Curr Genet, 1995 Nov;28(6):503-11Amillet JM et al., Curr Genet, 1995 Nov;28(6):503-11 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Hickman MJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2007 Nov;27(21):7414-24Hickman MJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2007 Nov;27(21):7414-24 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288C |
wt versus hap1DELTA YPD mid-exp cells aerobic conditions |
PubMed
Zhang T et al., J Biol Chem, 2017 Oct 13;292(41):16942-16954Zhang T et al., J Biol Chem, 2017 Oct 13;292(41):16942-16954 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
W303 |
hypoxic conditions |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
W303 |
YEP medium |
PubMed
Bergenholm D et al., mSystems, 2018 Jul-Aug;3(4):Bergenholm D et al., mSystems, 2018 Jul-Aug;3(4): |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Steady state aerobic chemostat cultivation at 30 .C in nitrogen-limited minimal medium containing vitamins and trace metals and maintained at pH 5.0 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Steady state aerobic chemostat cultivation at 30 .C in glucose-limited minimal medium containing vitamins and trace metals and maintained at pH 5.0 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Steady state chemostat cultivation at 30 .C in oxygen- and glucose-limited minimal medium containing vitamins and trace metals and maintained at pH 5.0 |
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
PubMed
Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
BY4741 |
YPD medium, 25.C |