Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Ino2p YPL231W PubMed external link Wenz P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2001 Nov 15;29(22):4625-32Wenz P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2001 Nov 15;29(22):4625-32 N/A N/A S288c N/A
PubMed external link Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive N/A Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Wimalarathna R et al., J Microbiol, 2011 Apr;49(2):265-73Wimalarathna R et al., J Microbiol, 2011 Apr;49(2):265-73 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Negative S288c exposure to 100 µM inositol
PubMed external link Chumnanpuen P et al., BMC Syst Biol, 2013;():Chumnanpuen P et al., BMC Syst Biol, 2013;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Steady-state aerobic chemostat 30.C
PubMed external link Bergenholm D et al., mSystems, 2018 Jul-Aug;3(4):Bergenholm D et al., mSystems, 2018 Jul-Aug;3(4): Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Steady state aerobic chemostat cultivation at 30 .C in nitrogen-limited minimal medium containing vitamins and trace metals and maintained at pH 5.0
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Steady state aerobic chemostat cultivation at 30 .C in glucose-limited minimal medium containing vitamins and trace metals and maintained at pH 5.0
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Steady state chemostat cultivation at 30 .C in oxygen- and glucose-limited minimal medium containing vitamins and trace metals and maintained at pH 5.0
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Steady state aerobic chemostat cultivation at 30 .C in ethanol-limited minimal medium containing vitamins and trace metals and maintained at pH 5.0
PubMed external link Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
PubMed external link Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 Direct ChIP-exo N/A BY4741 YPD medium, 25.C
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator