Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Msn2p YBR072W PubMed external link Martínez-Pastor MT et al., EMBO J, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35Martínez-Pastor MT et al., EMBO J, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression Positive S288c S medium
PubMed external link Treger JM et al., J Biol Chem, 1998 Oct 9;273(41):26875-9Treger JM et al., J Biol Chem, 1998 Oct 9;273(41):26875-9 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive JT659 Heat-shock treatment
PubMed external link Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-A Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C
PubMed external link Puig S et al., Yeast, 2000 Jan 30;16(2):139-48Puig S et al., Yeast, 2000 Jan 30;16(2):139-48 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Exponential-phase cells cultivated in YPD supplemented with 0.4% NaCl
PubMed external link Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD + 0,5M NaCl
PubMed external link Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0
PubMed external link Amorós M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32Amorós M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Heat shock
Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Osmotic stress
Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c oxidative stress
PubMed external link Aranda A et al., Yeast, 2003 Jun;20(8):747-59Aranda A et al., Yeast, 2003 Jun;20(8):747-59 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Acetaldehyde stress; Exponential-phase cells cultivated for 1 h in YPD supplemented with 1 g/L acetaldehyde
PubMed external link Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Negative S288c SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (2 generations)
PubMed external link Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive N/A Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
PubMed external link Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)
PubMed external link Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD 30.C 0.1 mM H2O2
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2
PubMed external link Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive IMZ066 Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)
PubMed external link Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 30 min shift to pH=8
PubMed external link Zhang N et al., Open Biol, 2013 May 22;3(5):120137Zhang N et al., Open Biol, 2013 May 22;3(5):120137 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Rapamycin and/or MG132 induced transcription of HSP26
PubMed external link Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45 Indirect GFP - wt vs TF overexpression Positive S288c Estradiol induced
PubMed external link Elfving N et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2014 May;42(9):5468-82Elfving N et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2014 May;42(9):5468-82 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive S288c SD + glucose + estradiol induction
PubMed external link Sarkar S et al., PLoS Genet, 2014 Jun 26;10(6):e1004456Sarkar S et al., PLoS Genet, 2014 Jun 26;10(6):e1004456 Indirect Western blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 200 ng/mL rapamycin
PubMed external link Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938 Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY5764 YPD 30.C
PubMed external link Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A YPD 30.C
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator