Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Msn2p YDR453C PubMed external link Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD + 0,5M NaCl
PubMed external link Hong SK et al., J Biol Chem, 2002 Apr 5;277(14):12109-17Hong SK et al., J Biol Chem, 2002 Apr 5;277(14):12109-17 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c double Δmsn2,3 mutant; post-diauxic shift
PubMed external link Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive YPH98 Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min
PubMed external link Wong CM et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2003 Mar 1;34(5):585-97Wong CM et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2003 Mar 1;34(5):585-97 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Oxidative stress, Exponential-phase cells cultivated in SC medium supplemented with 0.5 mM H2O2
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A
PubMed external link Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1B Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate)
PubMed external link Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive N/A Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
PubMed external link Berry DB et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7Berry DB et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD+0.7 M NaCl 45min
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium + 0,4M KCl (salt stress)
PubMed external link Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD 30.C 0.1 mM H2O2
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2
PubMed external link Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive IMZ066 Carbon-limiting (25 g/L glucose, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)
PubMed external link Huebert DJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53Huebert DJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c H2O2 treatment
PubMed external link Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45 Indirect GFP - wt vs TF overexpression Positive S288c Estradiol induced
PubMed external link Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A YPD 30.C
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator