Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Msn2p YFR053C PubMed external link Boy-Marcotte E et al., J Bacteriol, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52Boy-Marcotte E et al., J Bacteriol, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303 YNB medium
PubMed external link Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-A Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C
PubMed external link Tadi D et al., Yeast, 1999 Dec;15(16):1733-45Tadi D et al., Yeast, 1999 Dec;15(16):1733-45 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Diauxic shift; Late-exponential phase cells cultivated in YNB growth medium (0·17% yeast nitrogen base, 0·5% ammonium sulphate and 2% glucose)
PubMed external link Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
PubMed external link Berry DB et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7Berry DB et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD+0.5 mM H2O2
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD+0.7 M NaCl 45min
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium + 0,4M KCl (salt stress)
PubMed external link Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD 30.C 0.1 mM H2O2
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2
PubMed external link Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 10 min shift to pH=8
PubMed external link Hansen AS et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2013;():Hansen AS et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2013;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 1-NM-PP1
PubMed external link Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45 Indirect GFP - wt vs TF overexpression Positive S288c Estradiol induced
PubMed external link Elfving N et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2014 May;42(9):5468-82Elfving N et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2014 May;42(9):5468-82 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive S288c SD + glucose + estradiol induction
PubMed external link Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938 Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY5764 YPD 30.C
PubMed external link Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A YPD 30.C
PubMed external link Vamvakas SS et al., Biotechnol Prog, 2019 Mar;35(2):e2759Vamvakas SS et al., Biotechnol Prog, 2019 Mar;35(2):e2759 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant N/A W303-1A complete synthetic medium at 30.C, 6% v/v alcohol, aerobic growth
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator