Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Msn2p
|
YGR088W
|
PubMed
MartÃnez-Pastor MT et al., EMBO J, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35MartÃnez-Pastor MT et al., EMBO J, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
S medium |
PubMed
Schmitt AP et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82Schmitt AP et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
Methylmethane sulfonate stress |
PubMed
Rep M et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1999 Aug;19(8):5474-85Rep M et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1999 Aug;19(8):5474-85 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Heat Shock 30ºC - 37ºC 20min |
PubMed
Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-A |
Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C |
PubMed
Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD + 0,5M NaCl |
PubMed
Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0 |
PubMed
Amorós M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32Amorós M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Carbon source starvation |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Heat shock |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Osmotic stress |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
oxidative stress |
PubMed
Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
Indirect |
2D electrophoresis (WT vs msn2DELTAmsn4DELTAyap1DELTA triple mutant) |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Yamamoto A et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11911-9Yamamoto A et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11911-9 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium 39ºC (heat shock) |
PubMed
Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,08 generations) |
PubMed
Bourges I et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Aug 19;280(33):29743-9Bourges I et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Aug 19;280(33):29743-9 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Myxothiazol - Cells were cultivated in YPGal for 7 h and 50 min. Acetoin or acetaldehyde were added at concentrations of 10 mM, and the cells were incubated for 10 min. 8 M myxothiazol was then added, and the cells were incubated for another 10 min |
PubMed
Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
N/A |
Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h |
PubMed
Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min) |
PubMed
Yamamoto A et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2007 Aug;6(8):1373-9Yamamoto A et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2007 Aug;6(8):1373-9 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Diamide |
PubMed
Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress) |
PubMed
Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Sake mash on day 5 |
PubMed
Kim HS et al., Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2011 Aug;91(4):1159-72Kim HS et al., Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2011 Aug;91(4):1159-72 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
YPD+10%ethanol, 30 min |
PubMed
Solé C et al., EMBO J, 2011 Jul 8;30(16):3274-84Solé C et al., EMBO J, 2011 Jul 8;30(16):3274-84 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
0,4M NaCl |
PubMed
Huebert DJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53Huebert DJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
H2O2 treatment |
PubMed
Sasano Y et al., Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2012;():Sasano Y et al., Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2012;(): |
Direct |
RT-PCR - wt vs mutant promoter sequence |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45 |
Indirect |
GFP - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
Estradiol induced |
PubMed
Elfving N et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2014 May;42(9):5468-82Elfving N et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2014 May;42(9):5468-82 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
SD + glucose + estradiol induction |
PubMed
Cho BR et al., Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech, 2017 Jun;1860(6):695-704Cho BR et al., Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech, 2017 Jun;1860(6):695-704 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
1Â mM H2O2 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
2% lactic acid |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
2% glucose |
PubMed
Rajvanshi PK et al., J Biol Chem, 2017 Nov 10;292(45):18628-18643Rajvanshi PK et al., J Biol Chem, 2017 Nov 10;292(45):18628-18643 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
BY4741 |
2% or 6% glucose, stationary phase |
PubMed
Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938 |
Direct |
ChIP-seq |
N/A |
BY5764 |
YPD 30.C |
PubMed
Nakazawa N et al., J Gen Appl Microbiol, 2018 Sep 27;64(4):149-157Nakazawa N et al., J Gen Appl Microbiol, 2018 Sep 27;64(4):149-157 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
MCY3605 |
H2O2 stress |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
Shirakami kodama yeast (S. cerevisiae) IB1306 MATalpha ho |
Cells grown in supplemented synthetic medium (SD, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose, and a supplement with amino acids). |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
Shirakami kodama yeast (S. cerevisiae) IB1306 MATalpha ho |
Cells grown in supplemented synthetic medium (SD, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose, and a supplement with amino acids) treated with 0.3 mM H2O2 for 30 min at 30 .C (oxidative stress) |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
MCY3605 |
synthetic medium containing uracil with 0.3 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
PubMed
Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
YPD 30.C |