Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Msn2p
|
YMR105C
|
PubMed
Boy-Marcotte E et al., J Bacteriol, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52Boy-Marcotte E et al., J Bacteriol, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303 |
YNB medium |
PubMed
Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-A |
Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C |
PubMed
Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
Indirect |
2D electrophoresis (WT vs msn2DELTAmsn4DELTAyap1DELTA triple mutant) |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
PubMed
Yamamoto A et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11911-9Yamamoto A et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11911-9 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium 39ÂșC (heat shock) |
PubMed
Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
N/A |
Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h |
PubMed
Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress) |
PubMed
Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
IMZ066 |
Carbon-limiting (25 g/L glucose, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O) |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
IMZ066 |
Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O) |
PubMed
Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
10 min shift to pH=8 |
PubMed
Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45 |
Indirect |
GFP - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
Estradiol induced |
PubMed
Elfving N et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2014 May;42(9):5468-82Elfving N et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2014 May;42(9):5468-82 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
SD + glucose + estradiol induction |
PubMed
Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
YPD 30.C |