S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Condition
Msn2p	YMR169C	PubMed Navarro-AviÃ±o JP et al., Yeast, 1999;():	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	YPD medium, exponential phase; 2h incubation with 1M KCl
		PubMed Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD + 0,5M NaCl
		PubMed Aranda A et al., Yeast, 2003 Jun;20(8):747-59	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Acetaldehyde stress; Exponential-phase cells cultivated for 1 h in YPD supplemented with 1 g/L acetaldehyde
		PubMed Yamamoto A et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11911-9	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium 39ºC (heat shock)
		PubMed Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,19 generations)
		PubMed Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	N/A	Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)
		PubMed Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Sake mash on day 5
		PubMed Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	10 min shift to pH=8
		PubMed Huebert DJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	H2O2 treatment
		PubMed Hansen AS et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2013;():	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	1-NM-PP1
		PubMed Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Curr Biol, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45	Indirect	GFP - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	Estradiol induced
		PubMed Pfanzagl V et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	YPD 30.C
		PubMed Bai C et al., PLoS One, 2020;15(8):e0237540	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF double mutant	Positive	BY4741	YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
			Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF double mutant	Positive	BY4741	YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
			Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF quadruple mutant	Positive	SP1	YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
			Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF quadruple mutant	Positive	BY4741	YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)