Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Msn2p YMR173W PubMed external link Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-A Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C
PubMed external link Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive YPH98 Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A
PubMed external link Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1B Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate)
PubMed external link Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
PubMed external link Berry DB et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7Berry DB et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD+0.7 M NaCl 45min
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium + 0,4M KCl (salt stress)
PubMed external link Ni L et al., Genes Dev, 2009 Jun 1;23(11):1351-63Ni L et al., Genes Dev, 2009 Jun 1;23(11):1351-63 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c SD medium + NaCl 0,6M 30'
PubMed external link Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2
PubMed external link Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive IMZ066 Carbon-limiting (25 g/L glucose, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive IMZ066 Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Huebert DJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53Huebert DJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c H2O2 treatment
PubMed external link Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938 Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY5764 YPD 30.C
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator