S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Condition
Msn4p	YBR072W	PubMed MartÃnez-Pastor MT et al., EMBO J, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	S medium
		PubMed Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-A	Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C
		PubMed Puig S et al., Yeast, 2000 Jan 30;16(2):139-48	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Exponential-phase cells cultivated in YPD supplemented with 0.4% NaCl
		PubMed Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD + 0,5M NaCl
		PubMed Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0
		PubMed AmorÃ³s M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Heat shock
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Osmotic stress
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	oxidative stress
		PubMed Aranda A et al., Yeast, 2003 Jun;20(8):747-59	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Acetaldehyde stress; Exponential-phase cells cultivated for 1 h in YPD supplemented with 1 g/L acetaldehyde
		PubMed Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	S288c	SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (2 generations)
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)
		PubMed Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	YPD 30.C 0.1 mM H2O2
		PubMed Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2
		PubMed Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	IMZ066	Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)
		PubMed Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	30 min shift to pH=8
		PubMed Zhang N et al., Open Biol, 2013 May 22;3(5):120137	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Rapamycin and/or MG132 induced transcription of HSP26
		PubMed Sarkar S et al., PLoS Genet, 2014 Jun 26;10(6):e1004456	Indirect	Western blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	200 ng/mL rapamycin
		PubMed Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938	Direct	ChIP-seq	N/A	BY5764	YPD 30.C