Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Condition
Msn4p YHR087W PubMed external link Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,08 generations)
PubMed external link Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1B Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate)
PubMed external link Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Negative S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 10 min shift to pH=8
PubMed external link Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Diamide exposure-45min
PubMed external link Bai C et al., PLoS One, 2020;15(8):e0237540Bai C et al., PLoS One, 2020;15(8):e0237540 Indirect BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF double mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence Positive BY4741 YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
Indirect BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF quadruple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence Positive SP1 YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
Indirect BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF triple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence Positive BY4741 YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF double mutant Positive BY4741 YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF quadruple mutant Positive BY4741 YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF triple mutant Positive SP1 YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator