S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Condition
Pdr1p	YDR011W	PubMed MahÃ© Y et al., Mol Microbiol, 1996 Apr;20(1):109-17	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Cui Z et al., Mol Microbiol, 1998 Sep;29(5):1307-15	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed DeRisi J et al., FEBS Lett, 2000 Mar 24;470(2):156-60	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	FY1679-28C/TDEC	Cells in exponential-phase in SC medium expressing Pdr1 and Pdr3 hyperactive alleles
		PubMed do Valle Matta MA et al., Gene, 2001;():	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	SC medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Miura F et al., FEBS Lett, 2001 Sep 7;505(1):103-8	Indirect	ATAC-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	FY1679-28C	Exponential phase cells grown in YPAD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 0.004% adenine sulfate, 2% glucose)
		PubMed Miura F et al., FEBS Lett, 2001 Sep 7;505(1):103-8	Indirect	ATAC-PCR - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	FY1679-28C	Exponential phase cells grown in YPAD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 0.004% adenine sulfate, 2% glucose)
		PubMed Tuttle MS et al., J Biol Chem, 2003 Jan 10;278(2):1273-80	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Exponential phase cells cultivated in YPD growth medium
		PubMed WehrschÃ¼tz-Sigl E et al., Eur J Biochem, 2004 Mar;271(6):1145-52	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Onda M et al., Gene, 2004;():Onda M et al., Gene, 2004;():	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPGal + Adenine
		PubMed Anderson JB et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2006 Aug;5(8):1243-51	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium + increasing fluconazole concentrations (evolution during 100 generations)
		PubMed Fardeau V et al., J Biol Chem, 2007 Feb 16;282(7):5063-74	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4742	Cells were cultured in YPD up to an A600 of 0.5, supplemented with 40 microg/mL fluphenazine and incubated for various periods of time (2, 5, 10, 20, 40, 40, 80 min)
		PubMed SchÃ¼ller C et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2007 Dec;18(12):4932-44	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	0.3 mM 2,4-dichlorophenol
		PubMed Banerjee D et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2008 Jan;7(1):68-77	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Kolaczkowska A et al., FEBS Lett, 2008 Mar 19;582(6):977-83	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	SC medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD+1mM selenite 40 min
			Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD+1mM selenite 60 min
			Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD+1mM selenite 80 min
		PubMed Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2010 Jan;76(1):318-28	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	CEN.PK113-5D	0.2 g.l-1 hop iso-ALFA-acids,
		PubMed Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Khakhina S et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2015 May;14(5):442-53	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD (DELTApdr5DELTAyor1 background)
		PubMed Ling H et al., Biotechnol Biofuels, 2015;():	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	0.5 g/l galactose + 5% C11 alkane
		PubMed Vanacloig-Pedros E et al., J Biol Chem, 2019 Aug 30;294(35):12933-12946	Indirect	Luciferase - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	SD-His medium + 1 h with 50 uM citrinin
		PubMed Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314	Direct	ChIP-exo	N/A	BY4741	YPD medium, 25.C