S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Condition
Pdr1p	YOR153W	PubMed Meyers S et al., Curr Genet, 1992 May;21(6):431-6	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPGal medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Katzmann DJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1994 Jul;14(7):4653-61	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	basal conditions
		PubMed Decottignies A et al., J Biol Chem, 1994 Apr 29;269(17):12797-803	Indirect	Western blot - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Katzmann DJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1995 Dec;15(12):6875-83	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	WT cells expressing an over-active Pdr1 allele; cells grown to mid log phase in synthetic medium
		PubMed Katzmann DJ et al., J Biol Chem, 1996 Sep 20;271(38):23049-54	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Hallstrom TC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1998 Mar;18(3):1147-55	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Minimal medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed DeRisi J et al., FEBS Lett, 2000 Mar 24;470(2):156-60	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	FY1679-28C/TDEC	Cells in exponential-phase in SC medium expressing Pdr1 and Pdr3 hyperactive alleles
		PubMed Hallstrom TC et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Dec 1;275(48):37347-56	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Minimal medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Hallstrom TC et al., J Biol Chem, 2001 Jun 29;276(26):23674-80	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	cells grown to mid log phase in synthetic medium; double pdr1/3 mutant
		PubMed do Valle Matta MA et al., Gene, 2001;():	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	SC medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Miura F et al., FEBS Lett, 2001 Sep 7;505(1):103-8	Indirect	ATAC-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	FY1679-28C	Exponential phase cells grown in YPAD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 0.004% adenine sulfate, 2% glucose)
		PubMed Miura F et al., FEBS Lett, 2001 Sep 7;505(1):103-8	Indirect	ATAC-PCR - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	FY1679-28C	Exponential phase cells grown in YPAD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 0.004% adenine sulfate, 2% glucose)
		PubMed Teixeira MC et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2002 Mar 29;292(2):530-7	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	response to herbicide-induced stress (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid - MCPA)
		PubMed Tuttle MS et al., J Biol Chem, 2003 Jan 10;278(2):1273-80	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Iron repletion; Exponential phase cells cultivated in CM growth medium
		PubMed WehrschÃ¼tz-Sigl E et al., Eur J Biochem, 2004 Mar;271(6):1145-52	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Onda M et al., Gene, 2004;():Onda M et al., Gene, 2004;():	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPGal + Adenine
		PubMed Gao C et al., J Biol Chem, 2004 Oct 8;279(41):42677-86	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	Treatment with cycloheximide at a final concentration of 0.2 ?g/ml for 45 min.
		PubMed Lucau-Danila A et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(5):1860-8	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium + 20 mg/L benomyl
		PubMed Anderson JB et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2006 Aug;5(8):1243-51	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium + increasing fluconazole concentrations (evolution during 400 generations)
		PubMed Alenquer M et al., FEMS Yeast Res, 2006 Dec;6(8):1130-9	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed SchÃ¼ller C et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2007 Dec;18(12):4932-44	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	10 mM benzyl alcohol
		PubMed Banerjee D et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2008 Jan;7(1):68-77	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Progesterone stress
		PubMed Kolaczkowska A et al., FEBS Lett, 2008 Mar 19;582(6):977-83	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	SC medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD
			Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD+1mM selenite 40 min
			Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD+1mM selenite 60 min
			Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD+1mM selenite 80 min
		PubMed Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2010 Jan;76(1):318-28	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	CEN.PK113-5D	0.2 g.l-1 hop iso-ALFA-acids,
		PubMed Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Nishida N et al., Curr Genet, 2014 Aug;60(3):149-62	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	40% Isooctane
		PubMed Nishida-Aoki N et al., Curr Genet, 2015 May;61(2):153-64	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	S288c	grown in at 30 .C in SDC medium, after exposure of isooctane for 60 min
		PubMed Ling H et al., Biotechnol Biofuels, 2015;():	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	0.5 g/l galactose + 5% C11 alkane
		PubMed Vanacloig-Pedros E et al., J Biol Chem, 2019 Aug 30;294(35):12933-12946	Indirect	Luciferase - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	SD-His medium + 1 h with 50 uM citrinin
		PubMed Galkina KV et al., J Bioenerg Biomembr, 2020 Oct;52(5):383-395	Indirect	GFP - wt vs TF double mutant	Positive	W303-1A	YPD medium + 20microM PCP (pentachlorophenol)
		PubMed Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314	Direct	ChIP-exo	N/A	BY4741	YPD medium, 25.C
		PubMed , , ;():, , ;():	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	FY1679-28C	SC medium + 1h 100microM Cantharidin