S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Condition
Tec1p	YIR019C	PubMed Rupp S et al., EMBO J, 1999 Mar 1;18(5):1257-69	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	SD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Madhani HD et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1999 Oct 26;96(22):12530-5	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	Pseudohyphal growth conditions (4h of growth in yeast nitrogen base containing 50 Î¼M ammonium sulfate)
		PubMed KÃ¶hler T et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2002 Oct;1(5):673-86	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	cells grown to mid log phase in synthetic medium; multicopy or galactose-induced TF
		PubMed Gagiano M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2003 Jan;47(1):119-34	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed van Dyk D et al., Genetics, 2005 Jan;169(1):91-106	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	SCD medium
		PubMed Borneman AR et al., Genes Dev, 2006 Feb 15;20(4):435-48	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Low nitrogen (SLAD) medium
		PubMed Chen H et al., Genes Dev, 2006 May 1;20(9):1150-61	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	cells grown to mid-exponential phase in synthetic medium incubated 4h with aromatic alcohols (phenylethanol and tryptophol)
		PubMed Borneman AR et al., Funct Integr Genomics, 2007 Oct;7(4):335-45	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Jin R et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Jan;19(1):284-96	Indirect	GFP - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	filamentous growth inducing conditions
		PubMed Fichtner L et al., Mol Microbiol, 2007 Dec;66(5):1276-89	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	S288C	wt versus TF mutant Sc media OD:0.7
		PubMed Shock TR et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2009 Apr;8(4):606-16	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Î”hog1 background; cells grown under basal conditions
		PubMed Heise B et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2010 Apr;9(4):514-31	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	SC medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Chavel CA et al., PLoS Genet, 2010 Mar 19;6(3):e1000883	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	SIGMA1278b	wt vs DELTAtec1: total RNA was isolated from 25 ml cultures grown in YEP GAL for 8h.
		PubMed Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed BrÃ¼ckner S et al., Genetics, 2011 Oct;189(2):479-94	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Zhao XF et al., FEMS Yeast Res, 2013 Feb;13(1):50-61	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YNBD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed van der Felden J et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2014 Jun;34(12):2283-93	Indirect	GFP - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	SC medium
		PubMed Scherz K et al., G3 (Bethesda), 2014 Jul 9;4(9):1671-80	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	DELTAtec1 grown for 96 hr in square 120-mm Â· 120-mm Petri dishes in Synthetic complete (SC) media and amino acids: adenine sulfate 20 mg/liter; uracil 38 mg/liter; Lhistidine 38 mg/liter; L-arginine 38 mg/liter; L-tryptophan 38 mg/liter; L-methoinine 38 mg/liter; L-tyrosine 15 mg/liter; L-leucine 57 mg/liter;L-isoleucine 57 mg/liter; L-lysine 57 mg/liter; L-phenylalanine 48 mg/liter; L-valine 57 mg
		PubMed Vandermeulen MD et al., PLoS Genet, 2022 Jan;18(1):e1009988	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF mutant	Positive	PC538	YPD 48h, 30.
			Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF mutant	Positive	PC538	YPGAL 48h, 30.