S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Condition
Yap1p	YBR008C	PubMed Alarco AM et al., J Biol Chem, 1997 Aug 1;272(31):19304-13	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed DeRisi JL et al., Science, 1997 Oct 24;278(5338):680-6	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	Exponential-phase cells cultivated in YPD supplemented with 2% galactose to induce protein expression
		PubMed Jungwirth H et al., Eur J Biochem, 2000 Aug;267(15):4809-16	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed NguyÃªn DT et al., J Biol Chem, 2001 Jan 12;276(2):1138-45	Direct	lacZ - wt vs mutant promoter sequence	Positive	S288c	Methylmethane sulfonate stress
		PubMed Tenreiro S et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2001 Jan 12;280(1):216-22	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	benomyl stress
		PubMed Haugen AC et al., Genome Biol, 2004;5(12):R95	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	Synthetic complete medium after 2h exposure to 100 microM AsIII (30.C).
		PubMed Lucau-Danila A et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(5):1860-8	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	YPD medium + 20 mg/L benomyl
		PubMed Dubacq C et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2006 Feb;275(2):114-24	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium + 200mM hydroxyurea
		PubMed Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1B	Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate)
		PubMed Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	1.0 mM As(III), 1 h
		PubMed Teixeira MC et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2008 Mar 7;367(2):249-55	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Exponential-phase cells cultivated in minimal medium supplemented with 2 mg/mL Mancozeb
		PubMed Tan K et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008 Feb 26;105(8):2934-9	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	SC medium + MMS (methylmethanesulfonate)
		PubMed Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD
			Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD+1mM selenite 40 min
			Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD+1mM selenite 60 min
			Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4742	YPD+1mM selenite 80 min
		PubMed Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2
		PubMed Teixeira MC et al., Mol Biosyst, 2010 Dec;6(12):2471-81	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Mancozeb stress
		PubMed Galdieri L et al., J Mol Biol, 2012 Jan 20;415(3):464-74	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	benomyl stress
		PubMed Dejos C et al., FEBS Lett, 2013 Sep 17;587(18):3045-51	Direct	RT-PCR - wt vs mutant promoter sequence	Positive	S288c	YNB medium
		PubMed Zhang C et al., Yeast, 2016 Jan;33(1):5-19	Indirect	RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	SD medium + Nourseothricin
		PubMed da Silva SM et al., Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj, 2018 Oct;1862(10):2152-2161	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	YPD + 2â€¯mM arsenic