Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Yap1p
|
YDR453C
|
PubMed
Lee J et al., J Biol Chem, 1999 Jun 4;274(23):16040-6Lee J et al., J Biol Chem, 1999 Jun 4;274(23):16040-6 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
15 minutes exposure to 0.2 mM H2O2 (SC growth medium) |
PubMed
Wong CM et al., J Biol Chem, 2002 Feb 15;277(7):5385-94Wong CM et al., J Biol Chem, 2002 Feb 15;277(7):5385-94 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
H2O2 treatment |
PubMed
Hong SK et al., J Biol Chem, 2002 Apr 5;277(14):12109-17Hong SK et al., J Biol Chem, 2002 Apr 5;277(14):12109-17 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
oxidative stress (cells treated with H2O2 and diamide) |
PubMed
Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
PubMed
Wong CM et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2003 Mar 1;34(5):585-97Wong CM et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2003 Mar 1;34(5):585-97 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Oxidative stress, Exponential-phase cells cultivated in SC medium supplemented with 0.5 mM H2O2 |
PubMed
Haugen AC et al., Genome Biol, 2004;5(12):R95Haugen AC et al., Genome Biol, 2004;5(12):R95 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Synthetic complete medium after 2h exposure to 100 microM AsIII (30.C). |
PubMed
Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
1.0 mM As(III), 1 h |
PubMed
Tan K et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008 Feb 26;105(8):2934-9Tan K et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008 Feb 26;105(8):2934-9 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
SC medium + MMS (methylmethanesulfonate) |
PubMed
Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
BY4742 |
YPD + Sodium selenite (1 mM), hydrogen peroxide (0.3 mM) or benomyl (20 microg/ml) |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
BY4742 |
YPD |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
BY4742 |
YPD+1mM selenite 40 min |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
BY4742 |
YPD+1mM selenite 60 min |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
BY4742 |
YPD+1mM selenite 80 min |
PubMed
Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD 30.C 0.1 mM H2O2 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2 |
PubMed
Zhang C et al., Yeast, 2016 Jan;33(1):5-19Zhang C et al., Yeast, 2016 Jan;33(1):5-19 |
Indirect |
RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
SD medium + Nourseothricin |
PubMed
da Silva SM et al., Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj, 2018 Oct;1862(10):2152-2161da Silva SM et al., Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj, 2018 Oct;1862(10):2152-2161 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD + 2 mM arsenic |