Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Condition
Yap1p YGR088W PubMed external link Lee J et al., J Biol Chem, 1999 Jun 4;274(23):16040-6Lee J et al., J Biol Chem, 1999 Jun 4;274(23):16040-6 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 15 minutes exposure to 0.2 mM H2O2 (SC growth medium)
PubMed external link Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive YPH98 Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min
PubMed external link Wysocki R et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2004 May;15(5):2049-60Wysocki R et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2004 May;15(5):2049-60 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant N/A S288c N/A
PubMed external link Bourges I et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Aug 19;280(33):29743-9Bourges I et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Aug 19;280(33):29743-9 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Negative S288c Myxothiazol - Cells were cultivated in YPGal for 7 h and 50 min. Acetoin or acetaldehyde were added at concentrations of 10 mM, and the cells were incubated for 10 min. 8 M myxothiazol was then added, and the cells were incubated for another 10 min
PubMed external link Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A 0.2 mM As(III), 1 h
PubMed external link Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4742 YPD+1mM selenite 40 min
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4742 YPD+1mM selenite 60 min
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4742 YPD+1mM selenite 80 min
PubMed external link Ouyang X et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2011 Jan 1;50(1):1-13Ouyang X et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2011 Jan 1;50(1):1-13 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c H2O2 treatment
PubMed external link Zhang C et al., Yeast, 2016 Jan;33(1):5-19Zhang C et al., Yeast, 2016 Jan;33(1):5-19 Indirect RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c SD medium + t-BHP
PubMed external link Shedlovskiy D et al., J Biol Chem, 2017 Nov 10;292(45):18469-18485Shedlovskiy D et al., J Biol Chem, 2017 Nov 10;292(45):18469-18485 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPDA medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose, 10 mg/L adenine) treated with 0.2 mM H2O2 (oxidative stress) for 240 and 480 min
PubMed external link Nakazawa N et al., J Gen Appl Microbiol, 2018 Sep 27;64(4):149-157Nakazawa N et al., J Gen Appl Microbiol, 2018 Sep 27;64(4):149-157 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive Shirakami kodama yeast (S. cerevisiae) IB1306 MATalpha ho Cells grown in supplemented synthetic medium (SD, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose, and a supplement with amino acids).
Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive Shirakami kodama yeast (S. cerevisiae) IB1306 MATalpha ho Cells grown in supplemented synthetic medium (SD, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose, and a supplement with amino acids) treated with 0.3 mM H2O2 for 30 min at 30 .C (oxidative stress)
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator