Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Yap1p
|
YGR088W
|
PubMed
Lee J et al., J Biol Chem, 1999 Jun 4;274(23):16040-6Lee J et al., J Biol Chem, 1999 Jun 4;274(23):16040-6 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
15 minutes exposure to 0.2 mM H2O2 (SC growth medium) |
PubMed
Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
PubMed
Wysocki R et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2004 May;15(5):2049-60Wysocki R et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2004 May;15(5):2049-60 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Bourges I et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Aug 19;280(33):29743-9Bourges I et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Aug 19;280(33):29743-9 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression |
Negative |
S288c |
Myxothiazol - Cells were cultivated in YPGal for 7 h and 50 min. Acetoin or acetaldehyde were added at concentrations of 10 mM, and the cells were incubated for 10 min. 8 M myxothiazol was then added, and the cells were incubated for another 10 min |
PubMed
Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
0.2 mM As(III), 1 h |
PubMed
Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4742 |
YPD+1mM selenite 40 min |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4742 |
YPD+1mM selenite 60 min |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4742 |
YPD+1mM selenite 80 min |
PubMed
Ouyang X et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2011 Jan 1;50(1):1-13Ouyang X et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2011 Jan 1;50(1):1-13 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
H2O2 treatment |
PubMed
Zhang C et al., Yeast, 2016 Jan;33(1):5-19Zhang C et al., Yeast, 2016 Jan;33(1):5-19 |
Indirect |
RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
SD medium + t-BHP |
PubMed
Shedlovskiy D et al., J Biol Chem, 2017 Nov 10;292(45):18469-18485Shedlovskiy D et al., J Biol Chem, 2017 Nov 10;292(45):18469-18485 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPDA medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose, 10 mg/L adenine) treated with 0.2 mM H2O2 (oxidative stress) for 240 and 480 min |
PubMed
Nakazawa N et al., J Gen Appl Microbiol, 2018 Sep 27;64(4):149-157Nakazawa N et al., J Gen Appl Microbiol, 2018 Sep 27;64(4):149-157 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
Shirakami kodama yeast (S. cerevisiae) IB1306 MATalpha ho |
Cells grown in supplemented synthetic medium (SD, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose, and a supplement with amino acids). |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
Shirakami kodama yeast (S. cerevisiae) IB1306 MATalpha ho |
Cells grown in supplemented synthetic medium (SD, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose, and a supplement with amino acids) treated with 0.3 mM H2O2 for 30 min at 30 .C (oxidative stress) |